前言:想要寫出一篇令人眼前一亮的文章嗎?我們特意為您整理了5篇贏讀后感范文,相信會為您的寫作帶來幫助,發(fā)現(xiàn)更多的寫作思路和靈感。
(肖永卓)
一天清晨,太陽像一個紅紅的圓球,躲在稀疏的樹枝后邊,紅紅的光束從樹隙射到了我的床邊,好像在摧促我起床。我利索的從床上爬起來,伸了伸懶腰,快步的走向洗手間,媽媽在廚房里忙著為我準備早餐,洗漱完畢后,推開書柜,拿起一本《讀者》,津津有味地看了起來。我的眼珠停留在一個題目:《你也能贏一百次》,書中的故事深深地吸引了我。
這篇文章講的是作者的父親病了,得了癌癥,年幼的作者又不能為父親做些什么,面對即將逝去的父親他感到無能為力,正當他難過時,一個叫做沙吉達的小朋友出現(xiàn)在作者的眼前,沙吉達要求與作者玩拍卡片的游戲,可是作者無法走出父親癌癥的陰影,沒有心情與沙吉達玩游戲。但沙吉達想通過玩游戲的方法來幫助作者是,讓作者振作精神,要樂觀面對生活中的困難,沙吉達在玩游戲的過程中說:“只要你認真玩,你也能贏一百次”。在沙吉達不斷的鼓勵下,作者終于贏了好多次,沙吉達還不斷地鼓勵作者克服困難,要面對事實,勇敢頑強。最后沙吉達寄給了作者一個包裹,從包裹里作者才知道沙吉達也是癌癥患者,和作者玩完游戲沒多久就病逝了。
陳靜
朱自清的散文<<背影>>影響致很深,以致在中小學生的心中“朱自清”這三個字已經(jīng)與《背影》成為不可分割的一體。
今天,我也領(lǐng)會了大師的手筆—《背影》。朱自清的《背影》一開頭就使讀者一下子就抓住了中心,體會到了作品的中心。他之所以能感動讀者是因為他對父親的回憶時,寫出了真情實感,和許多讀者一樣,我印象最深的是胖胖的父親蹣跚的穿過鐵路,跳上去又爬上來,為的就是給兒子買橘子。在寫信的內(nèi)容中他寫到,“我身體平安;推膀子疼痛厲害,提筆,諸多不便,大約離大去之期不遠矣。這些寫得平靜而又自然;而且都真實地描繪了作者內(nèi)心對父母的喜愛,又因有這樣的一位慈父而感到自豪,歡喜。
文章最后寫到“我”讀到此處,在晶瑩的淚光中,又看見那肥胖的,青布棉袍黑布馬褂的背影。這表達了作者思念年邁的父親寫得凄切感人?;叵?,我們每人都有一位慈父,為何我們一定要等到父親年邁時才懂得父愛呢,父愛也是偉大的,有一句話說“父愛如山”這篇《背影》雖然很平淡無奇,甚至過于拙樸,但是如果我們細細品味的話,卻感到這篇文章蘊含著濃濃的父子情,其中蘊含著一股感人的力量。其實朱自清的散文本身就感情自然,語言樸素簡潔,結(jié)構(gòu)嚴謹細巧,語句婉轉(zhuǎn)?!侗秤啊肥撬捌诘拇碜?,他后來的散文更是語句洗煉成熟,《匆匆》、《荷塘月色》……
---Book Review: “Camille”
I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
The famous Russian novelist Chekhov created a down town by the township as apprentices, 9 year old boy, situated on a work in "all cards". Tells the tragic life of childhood here. After reading my tears, I can't be quiet for a long time.
Here is an orphan, only grandpa one. Grandpa is also due to economic difficulties, had to be 9 years old here to the city as an apprentice. Situated in the city alone, has been bullied. He was tortured - the boss hit him, and the food was poor, but there was no one to sympathize with him.
Situated at the head of the letter said: "I have no father and no mother, only one of your relatives." This shows that here is an orphan, lost the love of parents, the only ones - the poor old grandpa. Here is how poor, how unfortunate ah! The text also presents a real here at the boss's house being beaten, starved and cold situation, and why beaten? What do you use? How do you play? What do you eat for a meal? What are the specific written out. Here with such a dog's life at the boss's house, inspired me to Fanka misadventure of sympathy, the evil of the Russian ruling class really is murderous! The text also wrote, "dear grandfather, be merciful, take me out of here and go home, go back to the village!" I can't stand it any longer... I have no hope for my life, not even a dog. " Here for grandpa to bring him back to the village to a few words, these words piercing, copy from rolia. Where the card has become intolerable, life without hope, only a dead end. How cruel it is to exploit and oppress the working people by the reactionary rulers. I must cherish this perfect life, study hard, and strive to grow up all toiling big swollen days!!
In my childhood and childhood here, like a new society and an old society. When I was nine, I was happy, good and fun; there were many good friends around me, very free, and can do what they love to do. Hand clothing to eat a ready-cooked meal what do not have to worry about that; my childhood is like a colorful shell riotous with colour. I have been to many places and have seen a lot of beautiful scenery. My childhood is like a string of notes and can play a beautiful piece of music. My childhood always babbling, sometimes while he created music while dancing; my childhood like a diary found, every day can find different things, to learn and grow in happiness.
The poor is the work of Lev, Tolstoy, a famous Russian writer. At that time, the Russian working people were living in extreme poverty under the dark rule of the tsar, but they were kind hearted and noble minded. The text recounts the fisherman and her wife, SANA, who care and sympathize with the neighbor Simon. After Simon's death, the story of her two orphans is adopted, reflecting the pure and simple compassion of the poor and the noble quality of helping others. Through the life of the Sanna family, the author reflects the miserable life of the poor people during that period and their perfect mind.
The fisherman's family was very poor, and their days were very tight. But when the wife of the fisherman saw his neighbour Simon's death, and the sad and moving picture of the two children who were not sensible, he did not hesitate to take them home. After a series of psychological struggles, fishermen and Sanna firmly believe that no matter how hard they are, they should bring up these two children.
In this text, the deepest part of the text is: her head is back, the cold, green face shows the death of the quiet, a pale stiff hand that wants to catch what, hanging from the straw. Next to the dead mother, two small children were asleep, with curly hair, a round face, old clothes covered with old clothes, a curly body, and two small heads of light yellow hair close together. Apparently, when the mother was dying, she put her clothes on them and hugged their little feet with their old scarves. The child's breathing is even and calm, and the sleeping is sweet. From this startling description of the situation, I realized the poverty and misery of countless working people in the Tsarist era, and I also realized the great mother's love and the two children who were worried about the death of Simon.
What impressed me most is the description of Sanna's words: it's heartbeat badly, do not understand why, but I think it should be done. When SANA saw that two poor children were not raised by their mother, they would rather starve themselves or let Simon's two orphans starve to death, which fully demonstrated the kindhearted nature of Sonna. One of the words of the fisherman moved me out: "we have to take them and how to stay with the dead! Oh, we, we can always stay up!" this sentence is so firm, although the fisherman thought about his own days, but also insisted on raising the two orphans of Simon, showing the quality of the fisherman's help and the courage to respond. Although these words are made up of several simple words, they can reflect their good nature.
Reading this story, I think we should learn the poor, not greedy, selfish, more contented, more to share with others, and if we can have a noble, kind and compassionate heart, our life is plain but also very happy. On the contrary, if selfishness and greed are the same as stupid rich people.